Skip to main content
If you continue browsing this website, you agree to our policies:
  • Terms of User Agreement
Continue
x
FinDocNet
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • More
English ‎(en)‎
English ‎(en)‎ Suomi ‎(fi)‎
You are currently using guest access
Log in
Home Calendar
  1. Home
  2. Courses
  3. Tohtorikoulutusverkosto
  4. Vanhat Download-kurssit
  5. RE_Testi23
  6. Reflective Activities
  7. C3. Optional Reflective Activity - Research Funding
Assignment

C3. Optional Reflective Activity - Research Funding

Back to course

C3. Optional Reflective Activity - Research Funding

Completion requirements

This exercise is designed to explore your values and preferences around research funding. 





  • C3_reflective activity_funding.pdf C3_reflective activity_funding.pdf
    8 March 2023, 8:50 AM
◄ C2. Optional Reflective Activity - Supervision
D1.Optional Reflective activity - plagiarism ►

You are currently using guest access (Log in)
Policies
Home
  • English ‎(en)‎
    • English ‎(en)‎
    • Suomi ‎(fi)‎
Expand all Collapse all

Research Ethics Testi2023

33
 
33.3% Completed 1 / 3
Contents
    • Page
      Page
      Key course documents
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      A1. Optional Reflective Activity - Research ethics in your research
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      A2. MANDATORY Reflective Activity - Thinking through ethics
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      B1.1 Optional Reflective Activity - Your research context
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      B1.2 MANDATORY Reflective Activity - Subjectivity Statement
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      B2. Optional Reflective Activity - Exploring your values
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      C1. Optional Reflective Activity - Misconduct
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      C2. Optional Reflective Activity - Supervision
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      C3. Optional Reflective Activity - Research Funding
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      D1.Optional Reflective activity - plagiarism
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      D2. Optional Reflective Activity - Authorship
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      D3. Optional Reflective Activity - choosing a journal
    • Page
      Page
      B1.1. Case Study - Research Context
    • Page
      Page
      B1.2. Case Study - Industrially-sponsored research and confidentiality
    • Page
      Page
      B1.3. Case Study - Industrially-sponsored research and conflict of interests
    • Page
      Page
      B2.1. Case Study - Professor Helsinki
    • Page
      Page
      B2.2. Case Study - Workplace Recruiters
    • Page
      Page
      B2.3. Case Study - Police and Rescue Training Methods
    • Page
      Page
      B2.4 Case Study – Doing Research in Tinder
    • Page
      Page
      B3.1. Case Study - Dr. Apple
    • Page
      Page
      B3.2. Case Study - Dr. Sears
    • Page
      Page
      B3.3. Case Study - PhD Student and Data Ownership
    • Page
      Page
      B3.4. Case Study - Another PhD Student and Data Ownership
    • Page
      Page
      B3.5. Case Study - Third PhD Student and Data Ownership
    • Page
      Page
      B4.1. Case Study - Bill and Sara
    • Page
      Page
      B4.2. Case Study - Two kinds of research environments
    • Page
      Page
      B4.3. Case Study - New Collaborators
    • Page
      Page
      C1.1. Case Study - Colleague X
    • Page
      Page
      C1.2. Case Study - Potential Misconduct and Peer-Review
    • Page
      Page
      C1.3. Case Study - An unsuccessful grant application
    • Page
      Page
      C2.1. Case Study - Research Misconduct and Supervision
    • Page
      Page
      C2.2. Case Study - Misconduct and Mentoring
    • Page
      Page
      D1.1. Case Study - The Role of the Editor
    • Page
      Page
      D1.2. Case Study - Self-plagiarism
    • Page
      Page
      D1.3. Case Study - Plagiarism and Peer-Review
    • Page
      Page
      D2.1. Case Study - Determining Author Order
    • Page
      Page
      D2.2. Case Study - Assessing Author Contribution
    • Page
      Page
      D2.3. Case Study - Chancellor
    • Page
      Page
      D2.4. Case Study - Dr. White
    • Page
      Page
      D2.5. Case Study - Dr. Quick
    • Page
      Page
      D3.1. Case Study - Peer-review and confidentiality
    • Page
      Page
      D3.2. Case Study - Shared peer-review?
    • Page
      Page
      D.3.3. Putting Social Advocacy Before the Data
    • Page
      Page
      D4.1. The Magic Key
    • Page
      Page
      D4.2. Should Scientific Research Be Censored?