Skip to main content
FinDocNet
  • Home
  • More
English ‎(en)‎
English ‎(en)‎ Suomi ‎(fi)‎
You are currently using guest access
Log in
Home
Research Ethics Testi2023
33
 
33.3% Completed 1 / 3

Contents

    • Page
      Page
      Page
      Key course documents
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      A1. Optional Reflective Activity - Research ethics in your research
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      A2. MANDATORY Reflective Activity - Thinking through ethics
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      B1.1 Optional Reflective Activity - Your research context
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      B1.2 MANDATORY Reflective Activity - Subjectivity Statement
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      B2. Optional Reflective Activity - Exploring your values
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      C1. Optional Reflective Activity - Misconduct
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      C2. Optional Reflective Activity - Supervision
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      C3. Optional Reflective Activity - Research Funding
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      D1.Optional Reflective activity - plagiarism
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      D2. Optional Reflective Activity - Authorship
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      D3. Optional Reflective Activity - choosing a journal
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B1.1. Case Study - Research Context
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B1.2. Case Study - Industrially-sponsored research and confidentiality
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B1.3. Case Study - Industrially-sponsored research and conflict of interests
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B2.1. Case Study - Professor Helsinki
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B2.2. Case Study - Workplace Recruiters
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B2.3. Case Study - Police and Rescue Training Methods
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B2.4 Case Study – Doing Research in Tinder
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.1. Case Study - Dr. Apple
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.2. Case Study - Dr. Sears
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.3. Case Study - PhD Student and Data Ownership
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.4. Case Study - Another PhD Student and Data Ownership
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.5. Case Study - Third PhD Student and Data Ownership
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B4.1. Case Study - Bill and Sara
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B4.2. Case Study - Two kinds of research environments
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B4.3. Case Study - New Collaborators
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C1.1. Case Study - Colleague X
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C1.2. Case Study - Potential Misconduct and Peer-Review
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C1.3. Case Study - An unsuccessful grant application
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C2.1. Case Study - Research Misconduct and Supervision
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C2.2. Case Study - Misconduct and Mentoring
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D1.1. Case Study - The Role of the Editor
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D1.2. Case Study - Self-plagiarism
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D1.3. Case Study - Plagiarism and Peer-Review
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.1. Case Study - Determining Author Order
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.2. Case Study - Assessing Author Contribution
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.3. Case Study - Chancellor
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.4. Case Study - Dr. White
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.5. Case Study - Dr. Quick
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D3.1. Case Study - Peer-review and confidentiality
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D3.2. Case Study - Shared peer-review?
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D.3.3. Putting Social Advocacy Before the Data
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D4.1. The Magic Key
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D4.2. Should Scientific Research Be Censored?
    1. Home
    2. Courses
    3. Tohtorikoulutusverkosto
    4. Vanhat Download-kurssit
    5. RE_Testi23
    6. Reflective Activities
    7. B1.2 MANDATORY Reflective Activity - Subjectivity Statement
    Assignment

    B1.2 MANDATORY Reflective Activity - Subjectivity Statement

    Back to course

    B1.2 MANDATORY Reflective Activity - Subjectivity Statement

    Completion requirements
    Make a submission
    Due: Friday, 31 March 2023, 9:03 PM

    A closer look - writing your own subjectivity statement

    (PDF FILE BELOW HAS THIS SAME INFORMATION)

    Subjectivity statements can be written for many purposes and in many ways. In this activity the subjectivity statements are considered according to the structure developed by Judith Preissle in the Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research (2008), p.844. PDF of this also below.

    Here are some benefits of writing a subjectivity statement:

    • to clarify your own relationship with your research
    • to give context to your research for others to consider as a way of evaluating the validity, authenticity or quality of the study
    • to respond to requirements by journals or collaborators

    Subjectivity statements explore the relationship between the researcher and the research - considering methodology, topic and possible research subjects. Examples of how our personal history and characteristics may influence our research include

    • studying minority group you belong to yourself,
    • researching social impact of a disease someone in your family suffers from
    • researching a topic on which you have strong ethical or religious views
    • researching something you have invested a lot of time in and thus developed a close contact with


    Typically the subjectivity statement will identify the following aspects that may bias, unbalance or limit the research endeavor:

    • personal experiences
    • beliefs
    • feelings
    • cultural standpoints and
    • professional predispositions

    For example consider what these could be if the study focused on online gaming or experiences of a minority group - the relationship the researchers has in each group, the experiences he/she has had in these activities or the feelings they hold in relation to people in these groups may have a significant influence in what questions are asked, which methodologies are chosen and how qualitative material is interpreted.

    Typically subjectivity statements are evolving documents. The new experiences through the inquiry process will change the relationship each has with the research topic. There are also different ways subjectivity statements can be constructed. They can be either stories of the research timespan where the relationship is described from the start to finish of the project. Alternatively, subjectivity statements can be autobiographical in nature describing the person and their history and how these relate to the research topic.

    Typically all subjectivity statements will include basic data of the researcher such as their:

    • age
    • race
    • gender/sex
    • socioeconomic status
    • achieved characteristics like education or occupation

    The most valuable part of the subjectivity statement is the reflection on how these characteristics and the above mentioned beliefs, experiences and cultural points of reference may bias, influence or limit the inquiry and what steps have been taken to limit their influence.

    In this activity you are invited to start the process of writing your own Subjectivity Statement. You can choose your approach (e.g. autobiographical or research process). Make sure you include all the information you think is relevant considering how you being you may influence the research process. The true value to you and your reader is the reflection on how your characteristic and experiences may influence your research work.

    Use this space to start writing your own subjectivity statement. You may wish to first write it for you only, as an exercise to explore your relationship with your own research. Later you may wish to develop that into a statement you are ready to share with others and if need be, publish alongside with your research results.


    • B1_Reflective_activity_Subjectivity_Statement.pdf B1_Reflective_activity_Subjectivity_Statement.pdf
      8 March 2023, 8:50 AM
    • Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods- 2008.pdf Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods- 2008.pdf
      8 March 2023, 8:50 AM
    ◄ B1.1 Optional Reflective Activity - Your research context
    B2. Optional Reflective Activity - Exploring your values ►

    You are currently using guest access (Log in)
    Policies
    Home
    • English ‎(en)‎
      • English ‎(en)‎
      • Suomi ‎(fi)‎