Skip to main content
FinDocNet
  • Home
  • More
English ‎(en)‎
English ‎(en)‎ Suomi ‎(fi)‎
You are currently using guest access
Log in
Home
Research Ethics – Open Learning
33
 
33.3% Completed 1 / 3

Contents

    • Forum
      Forum
      Forum
      Announcements
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      Key course documents
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      A1. Optional Reflective Activity - Research ethics in your research
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      A2. MANDATORY Reflective Activity - Thinking through ethics
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      B1.1 Optional Reflective Activity - Your research context
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      B1.2 MANDATORY Reflective Activity - Subjectivity Statement
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      B2. Optional Reflective Activity - Exploring your values
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      C1. Optional Reflective Activity - Misconduct
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      C2. Optional Reflective Activity - Supervision
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      C3. Optional Reflective Activity - Research Funding
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      D1.Optional Reflective activity - plagiarism
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      D2. Optional Reflective Activity - Authorship
    • Assignment
      Assignment
      Assignment
      D3. Optional Reflective Activity - choosing a journal
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B1.1. Case Study - Research Context
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B1.2. Case Study - Industrially-sponsored research and confidentiality
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B1.3. Case Study - Industrially-sponsored research and conflict of interests
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B2.1. Case Study - Professor Helsinki
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B2.2. Case Study - Workplace Recruiters
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B2.3. Case Study - Police and Rescue Training Methods
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B2.4 Case Study – Doing Research in Tinder
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.1. Case Study - Dr. Apple
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.2. Case Study - Dr. Sears
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.3. Case Study - PhD Student and Data Ownership
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.4. Case Study - Another PhD Student and Data Ownership
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B3.5. Case Study - Third PhD Student and Data Ownership
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B4.1. Case Study - Bill and Sara
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B4.2. Case Study - Two kinds of research environments
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      B4.3. Case Study - New Collaborators
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C1.1. Case Study - Colleague X
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C1.2. Case Study - Potential Misconduct and Peer-Review
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C1.3. Case Study - An unsuccessful grant application
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C2.1. Case Study - Research Misconduct and Supervision
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      C2.2. Case Study - Misconduct and Mentoring
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D1.1. Case Study - The Role of the Editor
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D1.2. Case Study - Self-plagiarism
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D1.3. Case Study - Plagiarism and Peer-Review
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.1. Case Study - Determining Author Order
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.2. Case Study - Assessing Author Contribution
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.3. Case Study - Chancellor
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.4. Case Study - Dr. White
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D2.5. Case Study - Dr. Quick
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D3.1. Case Study - Peer-review and confidentiality
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D3.2. Case Study - Shared peer-review?
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D.3.3. Putting Social Advocacy Before the Data
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D4.1. The Magic Key
    • Page
      Page
      Page
      D4.2. Should Scientific Research Be Censored?
    Skip Latest announcements
    Latest announcements
    (No announcements have been posted yet.)
    Skip Upcoming events
    Upcoming events
    There are no upcoming events
    Go to calendar...
    1. Home
    2. Courses
    3. Researcher skills
    4. Research Ethics
    5. Open Research Ethics courses
    6. RE_Open23
    7. B4. Planning to Work with Others

    Research Ethics – Open Learning

    Topic outline

    • Course Home Page
    • A. Introduction to Research Ethics
    • B. Ethics in Research Planning
    • C. Ethics in Conducting Research
    • D. Ethics and Sharing Research Results
    • Assessments
    • Intro
    • B1. Research Context
    • B2. Data Collection
    • B3. Data Management
    • B4. Planning to Work with Others
      • Planning to work with others

        TENK
        Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity
        Responsible Conduct of Research

        Cooperation

        When launching scientific activities, have collaborative partners agree on objectives, rights and obligations. It is necessary to separately agree on compliance with responsible conduct of research, the related applicable guidelines and the handling of possible allegations of violation. Ensure that for example projects that have received EU funding comply with current European research integrity guidelines

        Activities that violate RCR

        Disregard related to implementation:

        • Causing inappropriate delays or difficulties in the work of other researchers

        Disregard related to demonstrating the relevance of scientific work or one’s own scholarly achievements:

        • Misleading the research community, funding organisations or the general public related to one’s own research

        Disregard related to benefiting from scholarly status:

        • Inappropriate use of influence

        ______________________________________________________________

        It is very rare for research to be done in isolation. Research is fundamentally a shared activity. We work together with the people in our own research group, we work with others studying in the same field, and we work together with those who make use of our research results. 

        In this section the focus will be on planning and preparing for different ways we work together with others. Planning for collaboration and having ongoing plans to manage collaborations reduces the risk of ethical problems appearing and will enhance the quality of research output. 


        Lecture - Working with Others

        B4_LECTURE_working_with_others.m4v

        Transcript

        Handout


        B4. Quiz - Planning to work with others


        B4.1. Case Study - Bill and Sara

        B4.2. Case Study - Two kinds of research environments

        B4.3. Case Study - New collaborators


        Resources:

        • Petteri Niemi (2015): Six challenges for ethical conduct in science. Science and Engineering Ethics 

    ◄ B3. Data Management
    ►C. Ethics in Conducting Research

    You are currently using guest access (Log in)
    Policies
    Home
    • English ‎(en)‎
      • English ‎(en)‎
      • Suomi ‎(fi)‎